Find
Inventory every AI tool in use — including shadow and embedded AI.
LFAIR · Law Firm AI Risk Management · Rose Law Firm
Answer 5 quick questions and get an instant snapshot of your firm’s AI risk exposure. No sign-up required.
AI risk in legal practice is no longer hypothetical — whether or not your firm ever made a decision to adopt AI.
AI is already inside firm workflows — through staff, vendors, and software never labeled "AI." You cannot supervise what you cannot see.
Judges are sanctioning unverified AI-assisted filings — hallucinated citations, privilege loss, confidentiality breaches — and the duty to verify is non-delegable.
There is no separate AI rulebook. The existing Rules of Professional Conduct already apply — anchored by ABA Formal Opinion 512 and Oregon Formal Ethics Opinion 2025-205.
Federal and Oregon courts have already ruled: the duty to verify is non-delegable. The lawyer who signs owns every citation.
One attorney used an AI platform to generate case law and never checked it — 8 of 9 cited cases did not exist. Two colleagues let their e-signatures ride along on the motion and were sanctioned too.
The Lesson: every signature is a certification. Your name owns the citations, even if someone — or something — else drafted them.
Counsel drafted a brief with a general AI tool, knew AI can fabricate quotations, filed without verifying — then did nothing after the government flagged the fabrications.
The Lesson: knowing AI fabricates and skipping the check is an aggravating factor, not a defense. Rule 11 is judged objectively.
Three summary-judgment briefs contained 15 citations to nonexistent cases and 8 fabricated quotations. Local counsel whose participation was merely nominal was separately assessed ≈ $14,206.
The Lesson: supervision cannot be nominal. Verification and candor duties reach every lawyer whose name is on the filing.
Figures drawn from public court records and reported decisions; amounts are date-sensitive and source-dependent.
No sign-up. No commitment. One question at a time.
Your answers stay on this device. Nothing is submitted yet.
This is a snapshot, not a full assessment. The LFAIR audit goes deeper — across tools, terms, policies, filings, and insurance.
We built LFAIR because we needed it ourselves. Rose Law Firm has used AI since 2023, and the audit applies the same discipline the firm runs internally to yours. Led by Adam D. Rose — Founding Partner, Harvard Law, Oregon Super Lawyer 2022–2026 — and delivered by a dedicated team.
Inventory every AI tool in use — including shadow and embedded AI.
Classify risk by tool and data; review DPAs, terms, and subscription tiers.
Approve tools, restrict client data, and build the verification workflow.
Update engagement letters; train staff on the actual tools they use.
Build the audit record and review it on a recurring cycle.
The LFAIR 10-Point AI Governance Checklist covers the areas every law firm should have documented before using AI — developed by the Rose Law Firm LFAIR team.
Plus 7 more across policies, court filings, client consent, and supervision.
No email required. Opens as a PDF.
We identify every AI tool in use across your firm, including ones that weren’t formally approved, and review their terms and data handling practices.
We review your existing documentation — or help you build it — to ensure your AI use is disclosed, governed, and defensible.
We assess your current workflows against Oregon court requirements and emerging verification standards taking effect January 2027.
We review whether your AI practices are accurately represented in your coverage — a gap that has caught firms off guard in recent claims.
Delivered as a risk assessment, prioritized recommendations, and a practical governance framework.
Schedule a no-obligation scoping call. We’ll walk you through what the audit covers and whether it’s the right fit for your firm.